One possible benefit from an “as you were” US Election
I wonder if all the businesses and high net worth individuals who spent so much on all the races in the recent election are evaluating their return-on-investment today?
Specifically, those who spent on a losing candidate.
Of course, those who spent money on a winning candidate will believe it was:
(a) worth it
(b) in part because of their spend
But wouldn’t it be nice if corporations and rich folk believed that investing in a real (job-creating) business would generate more return than investing in elections and politicians? And if they would do so with the same passion and commitment?